An abbreviationd name established in the judgment of the first instance is also used below the same.

[2] The Defendant owned each of the instant land on part of the instant land, and occupied the land of the said part, and also occupied the said part of the instant land by leasing and using the instant vinyl house installed in part of the instant land from G.

2. Determination

A. The instant project was designated and publicly announced pursuant to the former Special Act on the Construction of Bogeumjari Housing, etc.; pursuant to Article 12251 of the Addenda of the Special Act on the Construction of Public Housing, etc., the instant project was a project under the said Special Act from January 14, 2014; and Article 27(6) of the said Special Act on the Construction of Public Housing, etc. provides that “The Act on the Acquisition of Land, etc. for Public Works and the Compensation Therefor shall apply to the expropriation or use of land, etc. under the said special Act.”

In addition, according to Article 43 of the Act on the Acquisition of Land, etc. for Public Works and the Compensation therefor, landowners and persons concerned, or other persons who are not landowners or persons concerned, and have rights to the land to be expropriated or used or goods on such land, shall deliver or transfer such land or goods to the project implementer by the commencement date of expropriation or use, and according to Article 45 of the Act, the project implementer shall acquire the ownership of the land or goods on the commencement date of expropriation, and the other rights

As seen earlier, the Plaintiff is the Defendant, the owner of each of the instant dogs, and the vinyl houses of this case.