직업안정법위반
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds of appeal was known to the Defendant, and was involved in the job offer advertisement and employment process of this case through the son D.
Although the court below acquitted the charged facts, it erred by misapprehending the facts or by misapprehending the legal principles, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.
2. In light of the circumstances stated in its holding, the lower court, based on the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, ordered D, the representative director of the Defendant, to employ a contract-based employee, or was aware that the Defendant was aware of the content of the job offering advertisement from D.
On the ground that it is difficult to see that the charges were acquitted.
Examining the above judgment of the court below closely by comparing it with the records, the judgment of the court below is just, and contrary to the prosecutor’s assertion, the court below did not err by misapprehending the legal principles, or by
Therefore, the prosecutor's above assertion is without merit.
3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the prosecutor's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.