1. On March 9, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 16:59, the victim G, the owner of the E shopping district, and the victim D, the owner of the E shopping district of which the victim D works in Sung-gu, Sungwon-si, Sungwon-si, the Defendant: (b) around 16:59; (c) at the victim G, the owner of the said store; and (d) on the job where the said customer was located, whether the Defendant entered the other house without money;

monthly rent is 7 months to 7 months, and is living in South Korean house;

Does the tax guidance and creative reduction are identified, and it is difficult to petate theme.

“I am the sound,” and the victim G is different from the victim G.

Although it was required by the victim D to obtain a loan, it has been so sound that it is required.

Accordingly, the defendant injured the victim D's reputation by openly pointing out facts, and at the same time interfered with the victim G's operation by force.

2. On March 9, 2017, the Defendant: (a) expressed a large voice that the victim D resides in the counter H of Changwon-si, Changwon-si on March 22:18, 2017, and (b) other occupants could hear before the 5*8 5*8 ; (c) whether the Defendant was living in the office of South Korea and North Korea;

whether they live in South's house without money;

Doing out of creative mind, whether she is slick within his/her her father, or not.

“The reputation of the victim was damaged by openly pointing out facts by sound.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the public prosecutor with regard to D;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Article 307(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense (a point of interference with business) of the same Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Penalty of one million won to be suspended;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence (the fact that the defendant recognized the crime of this case, the fact that there is no record of criminal punishment, and the defendant's certificate of borrowing because the victim did not repay his/her obligation.