A. misunderstanding of facts and misapprehension of legal principles 1) The contents of the article posted on the Internet car page operated by the Defendant (hereinafter “instant article”) are not false facts.

2) Even if not,

Even if the defendant posted the article of this case for the public interest that the people should know without the purpose of defamation, the illegality of the article of this case is excluded in accordance with Article 310 of the Criminal Code.

B. The sentence of the lower court’s improper sentencing (an amount of KRW 3 million) is too unreasonable.

2. The lower court found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged on the grounds of the evidence indicated in its holding.

3. Determination on whether a deliberation was made

A. As to the assertion that there is no false fact in misunderstanding of the facts and legal principles, the part of the judgment of the court below that only the victim was treated as an empty person in Japan by the evidence duly investigated and adopted by the court below, i.e., the following circumstances, i., (i) the victim was not individually contacted by Japan, or he was fluored with P.m.; (ii) the victim was trying to contact the victim in the way of honorable treatment for the representative of the Dokdo organization in Korea, Japan was trying to contact the victim with the victim, and the victim was refused to see that “the victim was not exposed to an empty one,” and ② the defendant was called “ Q” as the title of “T”, and the judgment became final by being sentenced to a fine of KRW 100,000,000,000,000 among support payments, and ③ the K Epi also announced the fact that it was a false interview with the head of the media organization and announced the fact that the judgment became final and conclusive.

B) The lower court duly examined the part of signature operation.