The defendant is a part of the society that is separated from Co-Defendant B (Separate Co-Defendant).

1. On June 1, 2005, Securities Forgery B knew in front of the Daegu Northern-gu Office C office and asked the Defendant to “A’s endorsement on a promissory note (bill No. E) issued by Company D, 3 million won. At the above request, the Defendant, at his own discretion without authority at the same time and place, stamped the name “FC G” on the first page of the above promissory note No. 1 without authority, and affixed the seal under the name of G, the representative director of the said C(State) on the back of the said promissory note No. 3 million won, and then affixed it to B.

As a result, the Defendant and B forged the part of endorsement, which is a statement on the rights and obligations of promissory notes, which are securities, without authority, for the purpose of exercising.

2. Franchiscing B requested the discount of bill by sending one promissory note, the column of endorsement of which is forged in the same manner as the description in the preceding paragraph, to H (main) accounting director in Seoul, through a high-speed bus liner, at the end of the end of the end of the end of the end of the end of the month mentioned in the preceding paragraph.

Accordingly, the defendant and B used forged promissory notes in collusion.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each prosecutor's office and police interrogation protocol (including G, I, and I) with respect to the accused and B;

1. The prosecutor's statement concerning G;

1. Statement of the police officer to I;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a copy of a bill of exchange (the forward and back copy);

1. Article 214 (2) and (1), and Article 30 of the Criminal Act related to the facts constituting an offense, and Articles 217, 214 (2), and 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for the reasons under the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2 and Article 50 of the Criminal Act among concurrent crimes;