However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

around 15:00 on November 7, 2017, the Defendant collected the chair (70cm in length, 30cm in width) of the victim, who is a dangerous object from the victim and the victim, on the ground that the Defendant did not object to the victim D(56 aged) of the private cooking in the ship, at a restaurant in C in a sea where approximately 20 nautical miles (20 nautical miles in Yananan-gun, Yan-gun, Yan-gun, Yan-gun, Yan-gun, the Defendant laid down the head of the victim, on the ground that he did not object to the victim’s consent.

As a result, the Defendant carried dangerous things with the victim, and inflicted two injuries, such as the number of days of treatment, which is needed for three weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects of D;

1. E statements;

1. A report on internal investigation (Attachment of a medical certificate of injury);

1. C Application of the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes to photograph documentary evidence and file pictures with the intent to do so with C on-board assault;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (Article 55 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing)

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Code of the suspended sentence is that the crime of this case was committed on the ground that the defendant could have suffered more injury than the victim's head as the steel manufacturer.

However, in full view of the circumstances favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant recognized his mistake, the contingent crime, the fact that the defendant was a defendant's original agreement with the victim, the fact that the defendant received a letter from the injured person, and the defendant did not have the same criminal record, and other factors of sentencing as shown in the arguments in this case, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, family relationship, motive, means and result of the crime, etc., the punishment as shown in the text shall be determined.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.