도로교통법위반(음주운전)
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal (the imprisonment of six months, the suspension of the execution of two years, and the order to attend a law enforcement lecture 40 hours) is too unreasonable.
2. In full view of the circumstances after the instant crime, Defendant’s age, occupation, sexual conduct, environment, etc., and various sentencing conditions specified in the instant records and arguments, including the fact that the Defendant again committed the instant crime on July 17, 2017, even though he/she claimed a summary order on July 13, 2017 as a crime of violating the Traffic Act (driving of Drinking) by driving alcohol on June 23, 2017, and that there is no particular change in the sentencing conditions compared with the lower court, etc., the Defendant did not seem to have been punished by the lower court. Thus, the above assertion by Defendant is without merit.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.