beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.05.11 2016나9627

물품대금

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The Plaintiff’s cause of the instant claim asserted that, on August 24, 2015, the Plaintiff entered into a contract for supply of steel at the site of Jindo Co., Ltd. and Jinchi-gun C New Construction Co., Ltd., and that, as the Defendant jointly and severally guaranteed the debt for the payment of steel price, the Defendant, as a joint and several surety, is liable to pay the Plaintiff KRW 8,009,000 for steel bars.

2. We examine the judgment, and there is no evidence to prove that there is no evidence to prove the authenticity of the part in the defendant's name among the evidence No. 1, and there is no evidence to prove that the defendant jointly and severally guaranteed the debt of Hanjin-gu Co., Ltd.

Therefore, the plaintiff's assertion is without merit.

3. If so, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.