Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the evidence duly admitted, the lower court’s rejection of the grounds of appeal on mistake of facts on the grounds stated in its reasoning did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on intentional act of assault and intimidation against children and juveniles, as otherwise alleged in

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.