However, the execution of a sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On April 25, 2017, the Defendant driven a car of 00:10 B D, and proceeded with the intersection of 653-30 ahead of the 653-30 ahead of the city of Gangseo-gu Seoul as the airport of Gangseo-gu Seoul, Seoul, at a speed of about 30 km per hour, depending on the two-lanes of the 4-lane between the 4-lane eb.g., the e., the e., the air.

Since there is a place where the center line of yellow solid lines is installed, there was a duty of care to make a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle thoroughly and safely drive the motor vehicle on the right side of the center line.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to drive a stroke while driving a stroke, and instead, was the front part of the victim C(53 Systal si) driving, which is waiting to turn to the left at the first lane of the 5-lane from the stroke basin of the stroke, which is the opposite direction by the negligence of driving the central line while driving the stroke, and was driven by the front part of the Defendant’s driving.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by such occupational negligence, sustained injury to the victim C, such as salt pans, tensions, etc. in need of approximately two weeks of medical treatment, sustained injury to the victim E (the 30-year-old passenger) who is a taxi passenger, such as clocks, tensions, etc. in need of medical treatment for about two weeks of age, sustained injury to the victim F (the 29-year-old passenger) of clocks, tensions, tensions, etc. in need of medical treatment for about two weeks of age, and escaped without taking necessary measures, such as providing relief to the victim F (the 29-year-old passenger). Even if the Defendant immediately stopped, the Defendant sustained injury to the victim G (the 56-year-old passenger) who is the same passenger for about two weeks of age, and escaped without taking necessary measures, such as providing relief to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement of the occurrence of a traffic accident C;

1. Each statement of G, E, and F;

1. Blucs cambling CD images;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 5-3 (1) 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime committed;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Imprisonment with prison labor chosen;