2. Determination

A. It is recognized that the Defendant, who led to the instant crime, led to the confession of and reflect on the instant crime, and that he was the first offender.

B. However, a large amount of damage caused by the instant crime is up to 66 million won, did not agree with the victim, did not recover the damage, paid 2.3 million won, but all were appropriated for the interest and did not actually have been repaid.

In full view of other circumstances, such as the Defendant’s age, background of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence of the lower court is too unreasonable, even if considering the favorable circumstances of the Defendant as seen earlier, even if it is considered favorable to the Defendant.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.