2. The following circumstances are acknowledged: (a) the defendant's wrong recognition of and reflects on the defendant's attitude; (b) the vehicle driven by the defendant is covered by a comprehensive motor vehicle insurance; (c) the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant in agreement with the victim at the court below; (d) the victim does not look at the situation immediately after the victim stops on the bus at the two-lane; and (e) the governance governance has an influence on the occurrence of the accident of this case and the expansion of damage; and (e) the defendant has no power to be subject to criminal punishment except for the same kind of crime seen below; (b) however, the circumstance is acknowledged, such as the defendant's failure to perform his duty of care by the defendant, such as causing damage to the victim, and the degree of injury suffered by the victim by the victim, such as damage to the two-lane, etc. by the victim, and the degree of the victim's failure to perform his duty of care and the degree of injury suffered by the victim, such as the victim's injury in the

In light of the fact that the Defendant is already punished for the violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, including death accidents, the nature of the crime of this case and the possibility of criticism may not be considered to be less narrowly.

Considering the above circumstances and other circumstances, the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, the sentence imposed by the court below is heavy.

shall not be deemed to exist.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit.