If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

The defendant is a person who is performing the duties of the administrator of the D Building in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

In line with the contents of each judgment submitted by the defendant, the expression of facts constituting a crime should be recognized by changing part of the facts charged.

No one shall use an attached parking lot for any purpose other than a parking lot.

Nevertheless, from April 2014 to July 2014, the Defendant had S&P, a corporation, installed the facilities of the third deputy head, and operated the third deputy head, thereby using the attached parking lot for purposes other than the parking lot.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Orders for correction of violations of the Parking Lot Act, and orders for correction of parking lots attached thereto, and reports on parking lots;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of certificate of employment;

1. The act of “using a annexed parking lot for purposes other than a parking lot” under Article 29(1)2 of the Parking Lot Act regarding criminal facts and Article 29(1) of the former Parking Lot Act shall include not only the act of directly using a part of the annexed parking lot for the purpose other than a parking lot, but also the act of using a part of the annexed parking lot for the purpose other than a parking lot. A person who succeeds to the management of an annexed parking

(See Supreme Court Decision 2005Do7283 Decided January 26, 2006, etc.). Articles 29(1)2 and 19-4(1) of the former Parking Lot Act (Amended by Act No. 12473, Mar. 18, 2014); selection of fines

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;