공사대금
1. The Defendant shall pay KRW 34,942,50 to the Plaintiff the annual rate of KRW 15% from August 23, 2016 to the date of complete payment.
1. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the pleadings as to the cause of the claim Gap's evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including each number), the plaintiff entered into a contract with the defendant for the metal work among remodeling works for Daegu Suwon-gu Category C (hereinafter "the instant metal work") equivalent to KRW 107,50,000 for the total construction cost as shown in the following table. The plaintiff completed the construction work excluding the construction work equivalent to KRW 2,57,500 for the instant metal work at the time of the closing of the argument in this case, and the remainder of the construction work excluding the construction work equivalent to KRW 2,57,500 for the completion of the construction work at the time of the closing of the argument in this case; the defendant paid the Plaintiff the construction cost of the instant metal work at the time of May 12, 2016; KRW 00,000,000,0000; KRW 10,000,006,016.
The Defendant is obligated to serve the Plaintiff at the rate of KRW 61,00,000 on June 12, 2016, 12, 2016, including the 61,00,000,000 system contact sheets, etc. on May 12, 2016, including the 201,00,000, and the Automatic Automatic Automatic, etc. on June 26, 2016 (i.e., KRW 17,00,000,000, and KRW 18,50,000 on May 26, 2016 (i.e., KRW 18,50,000 on June 14, 2016, KRW 305,05,07,05,000,000 on June 25, 2016, KRW 205,507,507,507,000,00.
2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.