성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매광고)등
All appeals filed by the prosecutor against the Defendants are dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal against the Defendants in the lower judgment’s respective sentences (one year and six months of imprisonment; three years of suspended sentence; one year of imprisonment; two years of suspended sentence; two years of imprisonment; two years of suspended sentence; two years of suspended sentence; two years of suspended sentence; two years of suspended sentence; two years of imprisonment in case of Defendant G; two years of suspended sentence; two years of suspended sentence; two years of suspended sentence; and two years of suspended sentence) are too unreasonable.
2. In light of the fact that the defendants recognized the crime of this case and reflect it, there is no penalty more severe than a fine in the case of defendants A, C, D, E, F, and G. The roles of the defendants in the crime of this case are the defendants, the circumstances leading up to the crime of this case, the details and progress of the crime, the defendants' age, occupation, and all other matters concerning the sentencing specified in the records and arguments of this case, and thus, the prosecutor's assertion is without merit.
3. According to the conclusion, the prosecutor’s appeal against the Defendants is without merit, and all of them are dismissed under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.