However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On May 13, 2017, the Defendant driven B, under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 0.222% from the apartment parking lot to the fish elementary school located in 155-10 in the same language of the same 100 meters from the apartment parking lot to the fish elementary school located in 455-10, from the 100-meter section of the same 100-meter-ro, the Defendant driven B, under the influence of alcohol level of around 0.22%.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquire about the results of regulating drinking driving;

1. Article 148-2 (2) 1 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense and Articles 148-2 (2) 1 and 44-2 (Selection of Imprisonment);

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution is unfavorable to the reason for sentencing (the favorable circumstances of sentencing) - the section where alcohol content in the blood of the defendant is the highest degree of punishment. - The defendant has the past record of having been punished for the same kind of crime. - The favorable circumstances - the defendant recognizes all criminal facts. - The defendant has no record of having been sentenced to a fine until now. - The defendant has no record of having been sentenced to a fine exceeding the limit of the fine. The sentence is ordered in consideration of all the conditions of sentencing revealed in the course