소유권확인
1. The Plaintiff’s ownership of B forest land 979m2 in a public housing site shall be confirmed;
2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.
If a resident living in the administrative district of Ri constitutes a community consisting of all residents for the sake of the common convenience and common welfare of the residents, and uses a name of an administrative district and owns a certain property on the public register in that name, such a community is a so-called non-corporate group that belongs to the collective ownership of the residents; on the ground that the property belongs to the collective ownership of the residents; and on the ground that the property belonging to an Myeon or Gun, a local government, is an administrative district upon the enforcement of the Local Autonomy Act, the collective ownership of the
In light of the above legal principles, according to the overall purport of the statement and pleading evidence Nos. 1, 2, 1, 2, and 1 and 2 as to this case, it is reasonable to see that the land of this case is non-corporate body consisting of residents of Dri, Eri, and Fri, and that the land of this case is 979mm2 (hereinafter "the land of this case") under the circumstances of "C" on February 25, 1913 (the land of this case is not entered in the land register). The administrative district of this case is divided into Dri, Eri, and Fri, and C is now divided into Dri, Eri, and Fri. In light of the above facts and the overall purport of pleading, it is reasonable to see that the "C", which is the circumstance of the land of this case, means a non-corporate body consisting of residents residing within the administrative district, and thus, the plaintiff's claim for the land of this case is not accepted as the plaintiff's interest.