Nevertheless, the court below erred by misunderstanding the facts and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment, which found guilty of assault, which is the ancillary charge of this case.

2. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, i.e., ① the witness G and I stated in the court of the court below that the defendant committed an injury to the victim by lump-sum loss, etc., the witness G and I stated in the court of the court of the court below that the defendant committed an injury to the victim; ② the police of the victim F and the statements in the court of the court of the court below are consistent with the above witness’s statements, the defendant’s assertion is without merit, since it can be sufficiently recognized that the defendant committed an injury to the victim by hand, etc.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.