When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On July 21, 2016, around 08:10 on July 21, 2016, the Defendant went ahead of the Victim D’s house located in Jung-gu, Jung-gu, Seoul, with each other having a 35,000 Spanish, the market price of which is equivalent to the 35,000 won in the market price owned by the victim, which was placed front of the entrance.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Each photograph;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (related to calculating the amount of damage);

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order has the history of having been punished several times including imprisonment with prison labor for larceny crimes, and the defendant committed the instant crime without being aware of the fact that the defendant was committed during the repeated crime period, etc., which are disadvantageous to the defendant, the sentencing conditions against the defendant, the fact that the defendant was committed at the time and wrong, and the fact that the value of stolen goods is not significant, etc., shall be determined as per the disposition, comprehensively taking into account various sentencing conditions favorable to the defendant, such as the sentencing conditions favorable to the defendant, such as the age, character and behavior, environment, motive and circumstance of the