부당이득금
1. The Defendants are collected in accordance with the Seoul Central District Court Order 2012TTT 21704 and collection order 464,197.
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The lease deposit return claim of C&I Co., Ltd. 1) C&I Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “C&I”)
1) The Roloy Island Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Roloy Island”)
(1) On September 17, 2010, a contract for lease (hereinafter referred to as “lease 1”) with a fixed term of KRW 6.24 billion per month, KRW 72 billion per month, and KRW 15 years from the commencement date of the lease business, as well as the entire water structure of KRW 6.24 billion per month, KRW 72 billion per month, and KRW 15 years from September 17, 2010, in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 650, Seocho-gu.
(2) On December 30, 2010, a contract for the lease of two islands in the Roing Islands and its water structure with a deposit of KRW 3.4336.8 billion per month, KRW 386.64 million per month, and KRW 15 years from the commencement date of the term of the lease business (hereinafter referred to as “second lease contract”).
2) C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. and C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. and C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. on September 17, 2010 and C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C.
3) However, Cro-Japan did not start the Tech construction on the date stipulated in the first and second lease agreement without paying the balance of deposit under the first and second lease agreement and the intermediate payment of deposit and any balance under the second lease agreement to Pro-days. It notified Cro-days on July 8, 201 that Cro-days terminated the first and second lease agreement on July 11, 201, and it reached Cro-days’s notice on July 15, 201. 4) on the ground that Cro-days’s notice was served on Cro-days’s notice that the first and second lease agreement was terminated on July 15, 201, and that the notice was served on Cro-days’s notice on July 11, 201, as Seoul Central District Court No. 2011Da132666, Dec. 15, 2011. The grounds for the claim for damages, which is the violation of the obligation to cancel the agreement, which is the first and second lease agreement.