beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 밀양지원 2016.10.06 2016고단72

상해등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Criminal facts

At around 11:20 on January 6, 2015, with respect to civil petitions filed by the neighboring building owner E from a public official in charge of civil petition service of the Korea Civil Service Office in C, the Defendant: (a) conducted surveys over five times, but was confirmed not to have infringed on the boundary; and (b) sought explanation that the civil petition filed by the Defendant against the Anti-Corruption and Civil Rights Commission and the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport was not acknowledged as a violation of the boundary; (c) the Defendant stated that the above E is “whether the land is not the same as the land for the Korea Civil Rights and Civil Rights Commission, such as the owner of the land; (d) whether the owner of the land deducted the land according to the intention of the owner of the land; and (e) whether the owner of the land was spawned with the flash, and that part below the above E was flashed with sawk.”

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties related to the civil petition affairs of public officials, and at the same time, the victim E (the age of 43) needs to be treated for about two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement in the third protocol of trial;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. A complaint;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing bodily injuries;

1. The point of obstruction of performance of official duties by relevant legal provisions on criminal facts: Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act: Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of ordinary concurrent crimes (Punishments imposed on the crimes of bodily injury heavier than that of a judgment);

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment (the degree of obstruction of performance of official duties is not somewhat weak, the defendant's failure to receive a written application from the victim, and the defendant has no record of punishment, etc.);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;