2. Determination is recognized that the Defendant reflects the crime, agreed with the victim taxi company in full with the victim taxi company, and repaid the amount equivalent to the above medical expenses to the taxi mutual aid association in which the medical expenses for the victim F were paid.

However, in light of the fact that the defendant had already been punished several times for the same kind of crime, and that the drinking of this case, driving without a license, etc. was again released from the Incheon detention center for about four months, and that the nature of the crime was very poor in that the accident occurred while driving without a license, and that the defendant escaped without having been present in the examination of the quality of the warrant during the investigation process, and that the sentence against the defendant was determined in full consideration of the above various circumstances, and that there is no change of circumstances that may vary from the original judgment and the punishment at the trial, and that there is no other change of circumstances that can be different from the original judgment and the punishment at the trial, and all other circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing as shown in the argument and the record of this case, the defendant's argument cannot be accepted because the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.