The judgment below

Examining the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance in light of the relevant legal principles and the evidence duly admitted, the lower court was justifiable to have found the Defendant guilty of the instant charges, on the grounds stated in its reasoning, that the Defendant removed without permission a seizure indication attached to the seizure execution procedure of the movable property of 109 items planted in the golf course.

In so doing, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower court did not err by misapprehending the legal doctrine regarding the object of the crime of invalidation of indication in the line of duty, the grounds for appeal, and the scope of adjudication by the appellate court, or by failing

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.