The judgment below

Examining the evidence duly admitted by the first instance court, which maintained the reasoning, the lower court was justifiable to have determined that the Defendant was guilty of the charge of ex post facto bribery and the violation of the Personal Information Protection Act among the facts charged in the instant case on the grounds stated in its reasoning. In so doing, the lower court did not err by failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations, as alleged in the grounds of appeal, by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation contrary to logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on ex post facto bribery

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.