The costs of appeal are assessed against the plaintiffs.

the purport and purpose of the claim;

A. The Plaintiffs are the people of the F apartment G located in Bupyeong-gu Incheon Metropolitan Government.

The Defendants, around July 2017, have been directors H of the upper floor of the Plaintiffs’ house.

B. Since the Defendants’ director’s directors, Plaintiff A resisted several times the Defendants’ house on the grounds of sound to laundry, sound to laundry, sound to laundry, etc., and reported the Defendants to the police.

(c)

The Defendants, around July 2019, went to the directors in the above apartment.

[Reasons for Recognition] The facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, Eul evidence Nos. 11, 13, and evidence Nos. 17-1 and 2, video or voice, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Summary of the parties' arguments

가. 원고들의 청구원인 피고들은 이사를 온 직후부터 밤늦은 시간에 세탁기를 돌리는 소리, 발뒤꿈치로 바닥을 쿵쿵 찍는 소리, 망치질을 하는 소리, 굉장히 무거운 물건을 높은 곳에서 떨어뜨리는 소리 등을 냈다.

The Defendants, even though they are well aware that they suffered heavy pain due to noise, committed the above act intentionally and in bad faith.

As a result, the plaintiff A received a diagnosis of a dynamic disorder from the hospital and received a mental treatment, and the plaintiff B was a pregnant baby.

The defendants' act constitutes a tort that causes noise exceeding the limit of admission, and the defendants are jointly and severally liable to pay consolation money of KRW 10 million and delayed damages to the plaintiffs for physical or mental damage.

B. The Defendants asserted that the Defendants laundry was laundry at one time on September 2017, and there was no late time after they received the Plaintiff’s port from the Plaintiff, and there was no other cause of noise as claimed by the Plaintiffs.

Even if the defendant suffered a little noise due to the defendant

This is also in multi-family housing.