임금
1. The defendant's appeal and the incidental appeal of the plaintiff 1 to 8, 10 to 77 are all dismissed.
2. The appeal costs.
With respect to this case, the reasoning of this court is as follows: ① the judgment on the main defense of this case from 14th to 16th 12 of the judgment of the court of first instance; ② the judgment on the main defense of this case from 23th to 21th 25th 10 was stated in the reasoning column of the judgment of the court of first instance, including the attached Form, except for the following: As such, this part of this case is cited as it is in accordance with the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. The Ulsan District Court of the US District Court and the BZF union, which belongs to the major point of the defendant's assertion on the safety defense, agreed not to raise any objection, such as filing a lawsuit with the defendant in relation to the ordinary wages of the defendant, so the lawsuit of this case by the plaintiffs in this case is unlawful, and it shall not be deemed that the agreement of the plaintiffs in this case is against the principle of good faith.
Facts of recognition
In full view of the purport of the entire pleadings, the following facts are recognized in the statements of Gap evidence Nos. 4, 5, and Eul evidence Nos. 1 to 5:
(1) The defendant has a factory in harmony and Ulsan.
On April 10, 2014, the employees of the Defendant Ulsung Factory established a labor union for each company using the name “BZ trade union” (hereinafter “Ulsung Factory trade union”), and the employees of the Defendant Ulsan Factory established the CA labor union established the name “CA labor union Ulsan District Association” in the manner of joining the CA labor union on March 30, 2014.
(hereinafter referred to as “Ulsan Factory Trade Union”). (2) The trade unions of the Sungsung Factory and Ulsan Factory constituted a joint bargaining group on April 22, 2014 for wage negotiations with the Defendant in 2014.
(hereinafter referred to as the “joint bargaining group”). (3) The defendant and the trade union.