However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is the representative director of D Co., Ltd. for the purpose of manufacturing assembly metal products in Scheon-si C, and E is a director of G Co., Ltd. established for the purpose of excreta treatment business, etc. on the F4th floor in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and is in charge of business affairs, such as the receipt of contracts for construction works related to the method of treatment of excreta in Yong-Nam-Nam, such as Gyeongnam-do and Gyeong

1. On October 2012, the Defendant accepted the promise of receiving money and valuables related to H Improvement Work from the above D office, stating that “The public officials in charge of private viewing will make efforts so that he can be awarded a successful bid by the H Improvement Work, will be awarded a successful bid, and if the sales occur, 5% of the sales will be paid (200 million won)” from the above D office, and that “the head of private viewing I will make efforts so that he would be awarded a successful bid through I office because he had the house flick, so that the head of private viewing I office would be awarded a successful bid by I office, and instead, he did not talk to another person, and it was defective in our only in our country.”

As a result, the defendant promised to receive KRW 200 million on the referral of matters belonging to public officials' duties.

2. The receipt of money and valuables related to J general industrial complex wastewater treatment facilities E, as described in paragraph 1, has been made efforts to be awarded as a successful tender by the H improvement construction firm. On September 3, 2012, the submission of technical proposals and publication of guidance to the construction firm for the installation of J wastewater treatment facilities is defective, and the submission of technical proposals and first evaluation (economic and performance evaluation) was made on November 201 of the same year.

On November 2012, the Defendant, at the above D office, proposed that “the H Improvement Corporation will proceed more, which first submitted the recent technical proposal, and the low-income bracket should not make secondary technical evaluation in the J wastewater treatment facility installation project, which has completed the evaluation of the first economic feasibility, so that the Defendant could be awarded a successful bid as a treatment business entity, to the public official in charge of private viewing and viewing.”