However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

[criminal power] On November 23, 200, the Defendant received a fine of two million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) from the Changwon District Court through the Changwon District Court on November 23, 2000, a fine of seven hundred thousand won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) from the Busan District Court on January 30, 2009, a fine of three million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) from the Changwon District Court through the Changwon District Court’s Support on May 23, 2011, a fine of three million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act from the Changwon District Court’s Support on January 16, 201 to a fine of one million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (Free Driver’s License) from the Changwon District Court’s Support on July 2, 2012 to a fine of two million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (Free Driver’s License) and a fine of two million won on September 26, 2014.

【Criminal Facts】

피고인은 자동차운전면허를 받지 아니하고 2015. 8. 5. 23:23경 통영시 도남동에 있는 미륵도횟집 포장마차 앞 도로에서부터 같은 동에 있는 유람선터미널 앞 도로에 이르기까지 약 1km 구간에서 혈중알콜농도 0.071%의 술에 취한 상태로 피고인 소유의 C 스타렉스 승합차를 운전하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The circumstantial report of an employee;

1. Previouss before and after judgments: Application of criminal records, investigation reports (reports before and after dispositions, results of confirmation, and attachment of the same previous judgments) and statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (1) 1, and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting a crime (the point of a sound driving) and subparagraph 1 of Article 152 of the Road Traffic Act and Articles 152 and 43 of the Road Traffic Act;

1. Punishment provided for in Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of ordinary concurrent crimes (Punishment provided for in a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act heavier than punishment and choice of imprisonment);

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. On the grounds of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, the records and arguments of this case are shown in the following circumstances: the defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive for committing the crime, circumstances after committing the crime.