A. C’s spouse D, son and son’s son and son’s son and son’s son and son’s son and son’s son and son’s son and son’s son and son’s son and woman F, 3 South Korea G, 4 South H, 3 women I, 5 South K, 4 women L, and December 26, 1985, who died on December 26, 1985.

Since then, G died on December 25, 2005 and died on December 25, 2005, the plaintiff (O prior to the name of the plaintiff), P, and Q were co-inheritors.

B. The registration of transfer of ownership was completed on May 29, 192 in the name of K on the ground of “an inheritance by consultation or division,” with respect to each real estate listed in the separate sheet, which was owned by C (hereinafter referred to as “each land of this case”, and specified by the sequence in the separate indication).

From among co-inheritorss of C, the transfer of ownership registered in the name of K was made in accordance with the agreement to trust each of the above land in the name of K until the time of the next consultation on the division of inherited property in the future, but the other co-inheritors did not obtain their consent or approval.

C. Of the land Nos. 1, 2, 3, 8, and 9 of this case, the registration of share ownership transfer was completed on January 8, 199 for the Defendant on December 30, 1998.

With respect to the shares of 28/32 out of the land Nos. 4 through 7 of this case, the registration of ownership transfer was completed on March 4, 2005 on the ground of donation in the name of G.

On August 24, 2010, the registration of ownership transfer in the name of H was completed on December 8, 2010 on the ground of the Defendant’s share of 4/32 among the shares in each of the instant land in 28/32 (U.S. District Court 2009Na18356).

[Ground of recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap evidence 1, Eul evidence 2, Eul evidence 1, Eul evidence 2, Eul evidence 4, Eul evidence 4 (including branch numbers), and the purport of whole pleadings

2. The defendant's judgment on the defense before the merits constitutes a claim for recovery of inheritance. The plaintiff's lawsuit of this case constitutes a lawsuit for recovery of inheritance.