If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On December 1, 2020, at around 23:30 on December 1, 2020, the Defendant: (a) 112 reported to the effect that “the 112 police box B of the Seosan Police Station, which was called out, sent the Defendant to the patrol vehicle; (b) Sheet C, at the front of the E located in Seosan City, Seosan Police Station B, which was the Defendant’s residential location; (c) failed to drive the patrol vehicle in order to view the patrol duty; (d) prevented the Defendant from driving the patrol vehicle without any defects; and (e) obstructed the progress of the said patrol vehicle by holding the above C’s buckbbbbbbbs, which prevented him from proceeding again on the road front of the said patrol that he was going back.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention of crimes by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing police officers who suffered from police statements made to C, photograph booms, video, and brate campaigns to C;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Consideration, including the fact that the degree of damage caused by the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act does not focus on the degree of damage caused by the provisional payment order, the fact that the defendant is against the defendant, and the first offender