손해배상(자)
1. The Defendant’s KRW 53,108,958 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from June 4, 2011 to August 24, 2016, and the following.
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. A. On June 4, 2011, at around 21:10, the Plaintiff’s driver’s license, who driven a C rocketing car (hereinafter “instant car”) and proceeded ahead of the postal class intersection in the north-gu, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-do, in the direction of the postal class intersection, in the direction of the ordinary class, and was faced with the Plaintiff’s driver’s license, who was on the opposite road due to the negligence near the central line and left left.
(hereinafter “instant accident.” The Plaintiff suffered injury, such as the heart in the right part inside the inner part of the inner part of the satisfaction pipe, the inner part of the upper part of the upper part of the pelvis, the pelvis, the pelvis, the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the pelvis, the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the pelvis, the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part, and the pelvis
The Defendant is an insurer who has concluded a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the instant automobiles.
While treating the injury suffered by the Plaintiff in the instant accident on August 26, 201, the father D, the legal representative of the Plaintiff, agreed to receive 11,395,150 won from the Defendant as a whole under the law, such as consolation money, future sex and surgery treatment expenses, and direct non-payment treatment expenses, in entirety, for the damage caused by the instant accident on August 26, 201, that “The problem of the flachie disability (including operation) shall be separately responsible according to the medical diagnosis and opinion of the medical specialist (including the operation),”
(hereinafter referred to as “instant agreement”). [The grounds for recognition] The non-contentious facts, Gap 2, 4, Eul 1, Eul 3-1, the purport of the whole pleadings.
B. The Defendant is liable to compensate the Plaintiff as the insurer of the instant car for the damages caused by the injury to the Plaintiff’s top-down to the left-hand corner and sloping, the left-hand sloping, and the left-hand sloping.
As to this, the defendant asserts that the lawsuit of this case is unlawful as it was filed in violation of the subordinate agreement entered into between the plaintiff and the defendant.
However, as recognized earlier, the defendant's injury from the accident of this case is cut down to the left-hand corner and slot.