When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant: (a) was a person who manages the land of the victim D (Nam, 72 years old); (b) around November 201, the Defendant destroyed and damaged approximately KRW 10,000,000,000 in total of the market prices in the above land around November 201.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. On-site photographs and aerial photography;

1. The investigation report (or E relative investigation of a witness), investigation report (F relative investigation report (or relative investigation of a witness H), investigation report (or investigation report of a witness H relative), investigation report (I relative investigation of a victim), investigation report (in relation to the amount of damage), and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (subject to direction of inspection);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 366 of the Criminal Act regarding criminal facts and the selection of punishment (the selection of fine, criminal records of the defendant, the attitude of the defendant, the victim's shots, etc.) (the civil litigation between the defendant and the victim who committed the instant crime was completed as conciliation, and the sentence was determined in consideration of the fact that the defendant paid the victim an amount following conciliation);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.