A. On March 26, 2012, Defendant G organized the so-called “net System” (hereinafter “the instant system”) comprised of KRW 18,000 per unit, KRW 26,000 per unit, KRW 8,000 per unit, KRW 20,000 (or KRW 1,000 per unit, after the time when the time limit is paid), and operated the instant system by having the Plaintiffs and the Defendants, other than Defendant G subscribed to the said system.

B. In the instant sequence, Plaintiff A was 21; Plaintiff C was 1/2; Plaintiff C was 20; Plaintiff C was 1/2; Plaintiff C was 15; Plaintiff F was 23; Defendant G was 1; Defendant G was 1; 11; 13; Defendant H was 5; Defendant A was 7; Defendant J was 8; Defendant J was 13; Defendant G was 13 was 13; and the instant guidance was suspended on March 26, 2013.

C. From the No. 13 to March 26, 2013, Defendant H paid an advance payment up to March 26, 2013 to Defendant G, which is No. 5, KRW 10.8 million to Defendant H, KRW 10.6 million to Defendant J, which is No. 8, KRW 10.6 million to Defendant J, KRW 10.4 million to Plaintiff E, KRW 10.4 million to Plaintiff No. 17, and KRW 20,000 to Plaintiff B, No. 5.20, KRW 5.2 million to Plaintiff C, No. 21, and KRW 10.4 million to Plaintiff F, which is No. 23, respectively.

In addition, from the sequence of this case, Defendant H, No. 5, received respectively KRW 20.6 million from Defendant G, KRW 21 million from Defendant I, and KRW 21.2 million from Defendant J, which is No. 8, but Plaintiff D, No. 15, No. 17, and Plaintiff B, No. 20, No. 20, Plaintiff C, and Plaintiff F, No. 21, No. 21, Plaintiff C, and Plaintiff F, No. 23, which are Plaintiff C, No. 20, No. 15, and No. 15.

E. Meanwhile, around April 24, 2013, Defendant G lent KRW 10 million each to Defendant G, Plaintiff A, and F.

F. On April 26, 2013, K, the husband of Defendant G, paid each of KRW 400,000 to Plaintiff A, B, and D, and KRW 100,000 to Plaintiff F.

G. On May 2013, 2013, the direction of Defendant G, a leading owner, Plaintiff A, Defendant I, and Defendant G.