When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On May 18, 2016, the Defendant: (a) using the Defendant’s cell phone at an insular place on May 18, 2016, the Defendant paid the down payment to the victim who intends to take over the victim’s Dominianianian Institute operated by the Victim C; (b) requested the return of the down payment already paid to the victim who did not take over the said Dominian Institute; and (c) there was a dispute between the Defendant and the victim; (d) a person who was aware of the intent to take over and operate the said Dominian Institute from the victimized person, notwithstanding

(b) Hen's dysium is well dysn't dysium

(b) Whether there is a need for a large number of containers to inform C's malicious conduct is necessary.

No. 1241, the victim, such as the low, has not repeated twice.

By transmitting the text message “,” the reputation of the victim was damaged by openly pointing out false facts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness C and E;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. E statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a contract concluded between the complainant and the victim for the purchase and sale of the piano Institute, written statements sent and received by the complainant and the suspect, written statements given and received by the suspect and reference witness E, and application of each investigation report (not exceeding 66 pages, 95 pages; hereinafter the same shall apply);

1. Relevant Article 307 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment, and selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;