[2] Whether the so-called "work by father" is recognized

[3] The photograph, his family photograph, and portrait rights of the person actually displayed on the novel

[4] Whether defamation or infringement of personal rights in a case where a person’s life as a model in a novel book has been described differently from the fact

[5] Defamation against novels and deceased persons who modeled for deceased persons

[6] Whether the honor of this emblem and its bereaved family members has been damaged or their personal rights have been infringed upon with the words "non-permanent emblem" and "non-permanentization flowers"

[2] The Copyright Act aims to encourage creative activities by protecting a work created by time and effort. The original subject matter of a "work paid" is the author. Thus, the so-called "work made public by a person who is not the author" cannot be deemed to have infringed upon his/her copyright, regardless of whether his/her name is infringed upon by the personal rights of the person who is gathered.

[3] The act of carrying a photograph of a family without the consent of the bereaved family member of this rank, who is a nuclear material science, in a "non-permanent emblem", without permission of the bereaved family member of this rank, infringes on the portrait rights of the bereaved family member. However, since this rank became officially recognized in our society, and 18 years have already passed since it was deceased, using the photograph of this rank in the novel created by using the real name of this rank as a model, should be allowed unless the novel damages the reputation of this rank.

[4] The expression of a person who has become a model of the novel is allowed in the literature of the novel, but its part cannot be deemed as a constituent part of the novel, and at least in the literature, it shall not be expressed differently from the actual situation while describing the person who has become a model of the novel. In the letter of the novel, if the words "I would like to have been the fluor of the fluor of the fluor of the fluor of the fluor of the fluor of the fluor of the fluor of the fluor of the fluor of the fluor of the fluor of the fluor of the fluor of the fluor of the fluor of the fluor of the fluor of the fluor

[5] In a case where a person who has become a model in a model theory damages a person’s reputation, the person’s bereaved family may seek the prohibition of publication of the relevant novel on the ground of defamation or infringement of personal rights, and even in the case where the person who has become the model has already died, the person’s bereaved family may seek the prohibition thereof on the ground of defamation or infringement of personal rights. This is because human dignity and value under the Constitution is guaranteed during living only when he/she can live under the trust and expectation of his/her living protection from distortion which seriously damages his/her reputation after the death. However, in cases where a person seeks the prohibition of publication on the ground that his/her reputation has been damaged or his/her personal right has been infringed, in light of the aspects and degree of infringement, it should be recognized only where the person’s reputation has been seriously damaged, considering the aspects and

[6] The phrase "I," and "I," as a novel modeled to the emblem, which is a nuclear material science, describe the emblem as a whole, with the overall very positive expression of this emblem, and it may be said that the readers of our country who read the novel have caused the confusion of the defect in this emblem. Thus, it can be seen that the reputation of this emblem has been increased in our society. Thus, even if it is deemed that the appearance "after the use of the emblem or its model is different from the actual life of this emblem, it cannot be deemed that the reputation of the emblem has been damaged partly in the subjective sentiment of the bereaved family members, in light of the overall content of the novel, and it cannot be deemed that there was no intention to impair the reputation of the emblem, and that there was no infringement of the personal rights or personal rights of the bereaved family members of this country as an excellent student of this country (which can be regarded as an example to the people of our country).

2. The respondent Kim Jin and Song Young-man shall not publish, publish, print, reproduce, sell, distribute, advertise, or advertise "I will spawn the path of the Respondent's path of "I will spathn that I would have waived the spathm world where I would have become the highest reputation of individuals and have returned to the Republic of Korea without pointing out that "I would have predicted that I would have already died in a soft market," and "I would have tried to complete the development of the Republic of Korea and the Republic of Korea" without deletinging the expressions "I would like to release, publish, print, reproduce, sell, distribute, or advertise the path of the pathm."

3. The applicant's request for the beneficiary's benefit of the Respondent and the remainder of the respondent's contribution of the Respondent, Kim Jin and Song Young-man are all dismissed.

4. Of the costs of lawsuit, the portion arising between the applicant and the respondent shall be borne by the applicant, and the portion arising between the applicant and the respondent shall be five minutes, and the portion arising between the applicant and the respondent shall be borne by the applicant and the respondent, Kim Jin, and Song Young, and the remaining one shall be borne by the applicant, respectively.

2. Determination as to the part of the "Ethical emblem"

The applicants asserted that the respondent's official seal used the name of the applicants, who are their bereaved families, and without permission, posted the above emblem and the name of the applicants, which is the top of the above emblem, and the pictures and the letters of the applicants, without permission. In addition, the respondent's official seal used the above emblem in commercial use of the name, portrait, personal history, career, living conditions, etc. of the above emblem and the respondent's name, portrait, portrait, copyright, privacy (privacy), etc., and damaged the reputation of the above emblem by describing the actual life and death of the above emblem in the form of usual.

However, in full view of the statement of No. 13 in the statement of the above book, it is recognized that Eul published the "Nuclear Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical E

3. Determination as to the part regarding the “non-permanent volatiles”

(a) Infringement, etc. of copyright;

(1) Publication of letters;

(A) The applicant asserts that, when the respondent’s Respondent’s Respondent’s Respondent’s Respondent’s Respondent’s Respondent’s change and publication in accordance with the dancing Act, the above Respondent’s copyright was without the consent of the applicant who succeeded to the above Respondent’s copyright, personal rights and privacy.

(B) First, we examine whether the applicant is entitled to exercise the right of prohibition against the respondent's official seal based on the copyright of the above letter.

A work protected under the Copyright Act refers to a creative production belonging to the scope of literature, science, or art (Article 2 subparagraph 1 of the Copyright Act), and whether it is merely a simple letter personnel or fact notification is not subject to copyright protection, but it is not subject to copyright protection in order for scholars and artists to express their thoughts or emotions while describing their lives as well as their written opinions or artistic opinions, and ownership of a letter itself remains in the addressee, but the letter's copyright remains in the sender who has written ordinary letter.

In full view of the statements Nos. 3 and 4, and the testimony of the witness Park Jong-hee, the above novel contains 40 copies, which sent her mother to Lee Jong-hee, in the middle of the year from February 5, 1955 to August 30, 1972, after her mother left the US study. The letter concerns study and family life and research activities in the U.S., and the above letter indicates that the letter contains the character of the above emblem, and it is recognized that the letter falls under the work of the appraisal and idea of the above emblem, since it is recognized that the letter contains the character of the above emblem, such as her ability to live in the U.S., her mother, and her thoughts about the physical affairs, and that the letter constitutes an expression of the sentiment and idea of the above emblem.

On the other hand, in light of the above-mentioned 1, 2, and 12's respective statements on the above-mentioned necks, and the previous purport of oral argument by witnesses, these necks were killed due to traffic accidents other than the U.S. C. S. S., and there was no doubt that some of the Respondents were likely to kill traffic accidents, and the Respondent's Respondent's Respondent's Respondent did not know about the above Respondent's life and death, and there was no concern about the above Respondent's Respondent's Respondent's Respondent's Respondent's Respondent's Respondent's Respondent's Respondent's Respondent's Respondent's Respondent's Respondent's Respondent's Respondent's Respondent's Respondent's Respondent's Respondent's Respondent's Respondent's Respondent's Round's Respondent's Respondent's Respondent's Respondent's Respondent's Respondent's Respondent's Ro.

(C) Next, we examine whether the disclosure of the above letter by the respondent's official seal infringes on the above emblem and the applicant's personal rights or privacy.

The disclosure of a personal letter may infringe on a personal right or privacy, regardless of whether it is a copyright or not. However, as long as it can be seen that the above emblem explicitly consented to the disclosure of the above letter, the disclosure of the above letter cannot be deemed to have infringed on a personal right or privacy of the above emblem, and even if the above emblem certified in our society stated mainly his/her life, etc. on the part of the mother sent by the above emblem to the mother, even though the above emblem, which was accredited in our society, briefly mentioned the situation of the respondent, etc., on the ground that the applicant violated his/her personal right or privacy, it is not possible to claim a prohibition against publication of the above letter on the ground that the applicant violated his/her personal right or privacy (see the foregoing paragraph (2) below). Thus, the part of the applicant's assertion on this issue

(2) Preparation of a false statement

The petitioners asserted that the respondent's work of this emblem was infringed upon the copyright of the so-called "works of this emblem" that the respondent's work was written at will on July 1, 1956 (90 pages of the so-called novel business district) and on March 20, 197 (145 pages 145 to 146 pages of the so-called novel).

However, the Copyright Act is intended to encourage creative activities by protecting copyrighted works created by time and effort. Thus, even if a person who is not an author has made a work, it cannot be viewed as infringing his/her copyright, apart from whether his/her name is infringed on the personality right of the person who is gathered (in this regard, the decision in the following paragraph is judged). Thus, even if the respondent made a work at his/her discretion and expressed that the above mark was prepared in the above novel, it does not constitute copyright infringement. Thus, the above argument is without merit.

B. Infringement of defamation, personal right or privacy

The applicants distorted false facts in the above theory as shown in attached Form 3, and they arbitrarily prepared the first half of July 1, 1956 of the above emblem (No. 90 pages) and the first half of March 20, 197 (No. 145 pages 146 pages 145 and 146 of the above emblem) and indicated as if they were to have been committed. The above emblem and the applicants damaged their reputation, infringed their reputation, infringed their reputation and infringed their reputation, and, separate from whether they constitute defamation, they published private facts of the above emblem without permission and caused misconceptions to the general public. Accordingly, they asserted that the above emblem and the applicants infringed their privacy.

The respondent's "Slux emblem" is the so-called real name novel that has already been deceased. The novel is a creative production that describes the story that is developed by the author's standing, and is premised on the slux. It is often often a case where a author creates a novel (the so-called novel theory may be called the so-called novel theory) by using a figure that actually exists as a model, and a person widely known in historical human body or society may be a model to create a sluxity and a sense of sluxity. In this case, the actual name may be used as it is (in the case of the "Sluxine") and another name may be used as it is (in the case of the "Sluxine") and the actual name may be used as it is in the real name (in the case of the "Sluxine"). However, the novel's theory and the reality of this case may also be described as a model.

If a person who has become a model in a model theory damages the reputation of the person, it may seek the prohibition of publication of the relevant novel on the ground of defamation or infringement of personal rights, and even if the person who has become the model dies, his/her bereaved family may seek the prohibition thereof on the ground of defamation or infringement of personal rights. This is because human beings are guaranteed the dignity and value of human beings under the Constitution during living only in cases where he/she can live under the trust of and expectation for the protection of his/her living from distortion which seriously damages the reputation at least after the fact. However, in cases where a person seeks the prohibition of publication on the ground that his/her reputation has been damaged or his/her personal right has been infringed in the novel, in light of the fact that the freedom of art and publication under the Constitution are guaranteed, it shall be recognized only if his/her personal reputation

Comprehensively taking account of the descriptions of Nos. 1, 3, 4, and 8 through 28 and the whole purport of oral arguments in the testimony on the witness week, the above novel used the name of the 1935 life and the efficacy of the mother of the son, and used study to the United States in 1955 with very outstanding record at the time of attendance at the Seoul National University, and published a lot of thesis with outstanding achievements in the field of physical science by referring to the Respondent's theoretical and physical science, and the fact that the Respondent's development of the above Respondent's nuclear weapons was led to the death of the Respondent by referring to the above Respondent's non-permanent content and the fact that the Respondent's development of the above Respondent's nuclear weapons was carried out in the Republic of Korea, and it was recognized that it was carried out in the Republic of Korea by referring to the above Respondent's non-permanent content and the fact that it was carried out in the Republic of Korea's non-permanent and non-permanent content.

Therefore, even if the above novel uses the real name of the above emblem, and a large portion of the above emblem's life and the above emblem are identical, it can be said that the above novel in the above novel contains very positive expressions as a world physical scholars, who have strong respect for the mother, and set an example to our people, as a whole, as well as the character of the above emblem in light of social norms, and thus, it can be deemed that the above emblem has increased more in our society, so even if the above emblem is described differently from the actual life of the above emblem, and the applicants have partly damaged the above emblem's reputation as a whole, it cannot be deemed that the above emblem's reputation was damaged in light of social norms and the overall content of the above novel, and that the above emblem's reputation cannot be seen as an example to our people who have damaged the above emblem's reputation as the respondent's personality right (see the proviso to Article 14 (2) of the Copyright Act).

Therefore, the above part of the claimant's assertion is without merit, which is premised on the fact that the above emblem and the applicant's reputation were damaged and that personal rights or privacy was infringed due to the above novel.

C. Violation of portrait rights

The applicant asserts that the respondent's official seal infringed his portrait rights by inserting the above emblem and the photograph of the applicant without permission, as shown in attached Table 2.

In full view of the statements and videos of Nos. 3, 4, Eul evidence 8, Eul evidence 9-1 through 7 of Eul evidence No. 9-7, and the whole purport of the pleading, the above Lee Dong-Ba and the applicant's photograph obtained from the above No. 135 pages of the business district of "No. Ba-Ba", and the above Lee Dong-Ba and the applicant's family photograph shall be published, and it is recognized that the above Lee Dong-Ba and the applicant's photograph have been posted on other pages of the above novel.

First of all, the act of carrying the above insignias and the applicant's family photographs without the consent of the applicant without permission by the applicant violates the applicant's portrait rights. Thus, the applicant who belongs to the respondent's office shall not be obliged to publish, publish, print, reproduce, sell, distribute, advertise, or advertise the above emblems and the applicant's family photographs in the business district 135 page of the "Nopool" business district.

Next, as mentioned above, the above Lee Jong-hoon's photograph as to his photograph of this rank shall be recognized by our society, and since 18 years have already passed since the above rank rank was deceased, using the above rank rank in the novel created by using the real name of the above rank rank as the model of the above rank rank shall be allowed unless the above rank rank damage the reputation of the above rank rank. Thus, the above assertion by the applicants on this part is without merit.

D. Infringement of the right to name.

Claimant asserts that the respondent's Respondent's Respondent's Respondent's Respondent's Respondent's Respondent's Respondent's Respondent's Respondent's Respondent's Respondent's

However, as seen earlier, it is permitted for the respondent to use the name of the above emblem as a model of the above emblem, and even if the above emblem used the name of the applicant who is the bereaved family member of the above emblem, the above emblem should be approved by the family member of the above emblem, which is a certified public official. Therefore, the above assertion is without merit.

E. Infringement of the right of publicity

The applicants asserted that the above insignias violated the right of publicity by using the property value of the above insignias and the applicant's name, portrait, history, career, living conditions, etc., as well as the applicant's name, portrait, history, character of life, etc.

However, the right of publicity can be said to be the right of commercial use of matters belonging to privacy, such as the name and portrait of a famous person who has property value. However, even if the above novel, which is a literary work, used the name, photograph, etc. of the above emblem, it cannot be deemed to have been used commercially. Thus, the above assertion is without merit.

4. Judgment on the part "I ambl the flame"

A. Infringement of defamation, personal right, or privacy

(1) Comprehensively taking account of each description of the Respondent Nos. 5 through 28 and the testimony on the witness platform, the respondent Kim Jin-jin expressed that the above Respondent was a novel modeled for the above Respondent's "I have renounced the Belgium flicker who returned to the Republic of Korea without pointing out the death of an individual's highest reputation," and the "Ylcheon-Liology who returned to the Republic of Korea" and "I have predicted the death of his flicker with his flick board" and the Respondent who tried to complete the flick and nuclear development. The Respondent's Respondent's Respondent's presentation of the above flick book, and it is recognized that the Respondent's flick book was not involved in nuclear development in our country, and it cannot be viewed that the above Respondent's flicker's expression and the Respondent's personality right was infringed by clearly describing the above flicker's life and the above flick model.

(2) The applicants filed a false misunderstanding, distorted, and distorted about the applicant's life and death as shown in Appendix 4, and about the applicant's living and character of the above emblem, and cited the letter of Park Jong-hee's President Park Jong-hee's letter, who is the respondent's letter under the Respondent's official seat, and the day of the above emblem's letter of the above emblem's letter of 87 through 90, and cited the above "Seoul-U.S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S.s.s

Comprehensively taking account of the following facts: (a) No. 1 and No. 5 to 28, the Defendant entered the above-mentioned No. 1 and the testimony on the witness, and (b) the above-mentioned No. 1 to 1935, who entered the Republic of Korea’s name and entered the Republic of Korea’s name and entered the Republic of Korea’s name and entered the Republic of Korea’s name and entered the 195-U.S. Research Institute of Fmib in the U.S.; (c) it was recognized that the above-mentioned No. 1 and No. 28 had been de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto, and had been de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto de facto in the Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea.

In light of the fact that it is guaranteed by the above part of the judgment on the above Ba-Ba-Ba-Ba-Ba-Ba-Ba-Ba-Ba-Ba-Ba-Ba-ri's above Ba-Ba-ri's theory that the above Ba-Ba-Ba-Ba-ri's Ba-Ba-ri's Ba-ri's Ba-Ba-ri's Ba-Ba-ri's Ba-Ba-ri's Ba-Ba-ri's Ba-Ba-ri's Ba-Ba-ri's Ba-Ba-ri's Ba-Ba-ri's Ba-Ba-ri's Ba-ri's Ba-Ba-ri's Ba-ri's Ba-ri's Ba-ri's Ba-ri's Ba-ri's Ba-ri's Ba-ri's Ba-ri's Ba-ri's Ba-ri's Ba-ri's Ba-ri's Ba-ri's Ba-ri'''''

In addition, even if the work of citing and citing the fabricated flag or letter, as seen in the above 3. A. (2), the so-called “buster’s copyright” is not recognized, and the above novel constitutes the constituent part of the novel, such as the fabricated one, etc., and as a whole, unless the above novel is defamation against the above emblem, it cannot be deemed that the above emblem and the applicant’s personality right or privacy right was infringed (see the above 3.b., e., Paragraph (2)).

Therefore, all of the applicants' arguments on the premise that the applicant's copyright, personal right, or privacy has been infringed are without merit.

B. Violation of portrait rights

The applicants asserted that the respondent Kim Jin-jin and Song Young-man violated their portrait rights by inserting the photographs of this emblem without permission at the time of the newspaper advertisement "I have sleeped to the Luxembourg".

However, even if the above respondent used the photographs of the above insignia for the purpose of commercial use of them in the newspaper advertisement, such reason does not constitute a ground for demanding the prohibition of publication of the above novel itself. Therefore, the above argument is without merit.

(c) the applicant’s personal rights of Murian-Saeuri and Sari-Sari Sari-Sari

Although the applicant, who is the denial of the above display, is still living in the court of Murian, the denial after use in the above display theory is deemed to have already been deceased, and even though there are the applicant who is the applicant for the applicant who is his/her father, and the applicant for the applicant who is his/her father, who is his/her father, in the above novel theory, there is only one incidental to the applicant after the use, and the applicant who is his/her father did not exist in the above novel theory, and therefore, the applicant who is his/her father-ri and the applicant for the registration has infringed on the applicant's personality rights.

It may vary from the theory that has a certain person's model to a different family relationship, and it is necessary to simplify factual relations for the extreme composition of the novel, so long as it is a novel, it is natural to do so. Thus, even if the above novel states the family relationship after the use of the above emblem as a model differently from the fact, it cannot be deemed as infringing on the above applicant's personality right, which is the bereaved family member of the above emblem. Thus, the above assertion is without merit.

D. Infringement of the right to name.

At the end of the author of the above novel, the applicants indicated the name of the respondent Kim Jin and Song Young-man without permission, and indicated the name of the person as the model of the above Lee Jong-tae in the novel, as "after use", and indicated as "after use the name of the applicant" or "JL", which infringed the applicant's right to name as a personal right element of the name itself, and used the property value and infringed his/her right to name as a property element.

As seen earlier, in the above novel, the person's name as the model of the above emblem is "after use", and the name of his father is "Ye L" or "Je L", and the name of the above emblem is used by disclosing from the end of the author of the above novel that the above emblem is a model of the above emblem, but the name of the above emblem may be used after use and the present name may be used in the theory of the model, unlike the actual name of the model, and it is permitted to indicate the actual name of the trademark in writing, etc. to refer to the model. Therefore, the above argument is without merit.

E. Infringement of publicity right

The applicants pointed out the following: (a) the part of the above novel was buried in a national cemetery after use; (b) the part of the use that the loan funds for the promotion of science scheduled in Israel return to Korea; (c) the part that the use was postponed after use due to the reverse speed of the launch process for the landing of the ship in the Aolro Plan in the United States; (d) the part that the use was delayed after use, and the part that the use took alcohol with the president of the amblings and the internal donations. Such part is deemed to have commercial usefulness, and is thus infringing the right of publicity of the above emblem, which is a model after the use. Also, the respondent's name, the respondent's history, personal history, career, achievements, social evaluation, living conditions, etc. of the above Lee Jin, infringed the right of publicity by using the newspaper, the commercialization without permission, and the commercial use of these parts.

However, it is natural to create the above-mentioned creation in the above-mentioned novel, which is a literary work, after the use of the above-mentioned emblem as a model, as long as it is a novel, and this cannot be deemed to have used the above-mentioned content commercially, and even if the above-mentioned content was infringed on the right of publicity in the advertisement, it does not constitute a ground for seeking the prohibition of publication of the above-mentioned novel. Therefore, the above argument is without merit.

5. Conclusion

Therefore, the Respondent's application for the respondent's Respondent's Round, Kim Jin and Song-young shall be accepted within the scope of the above recognition with the reasons, and the applications for the respondent's Pool and the remainder of the respondent's Pool Kim Jong-su and Kim Jong-young shall be dismissed for all reasons, and it is so decided as per Disposition

[Attachment 1.2. omitted]

[Attachment 3](Attachment 3](The content indicated differently from the fact as to the emblem in the “Nuriuriar”)

1. From 109 to 129 pages n of the “Neuri Insignia” described as if the interview had not been made with the President Park Jong-hee on September 26, 1974.

2. From March 20, 197 to 150 of the above novel Nos. 142 to 150, arbitrarily operated the Japanese flag of the above Lee Jong-hee on March 20, 197, and arbitrarily fabricated the letters of the President Park Jong-hee on March 18, 197, and described the form of the above emblem that is to be considered on this.

3. From 160 pages 160 of the above novels, the above Lee Jong-hee surgery was performed to put the bridge on the bell and the bones in the bones, and on May 19, 197, he stated that on May 19, 197, Park Jong-hee had provided the above brue document to the President of the Republic of Korea.

4. In the above novel Nos. 188 to 191, the above emblem stated that it died in the United States.

5. In the above novel Nos. 209 to 210, the above emblem stated that it was killed in North Korea or the United States.

[Attachment 4] [Attachment 4] (Post-use, the contents relating to the port of entry) after use in the "Iskylty Islish."

1. Ethical net (1° 13 to 22 pages);

The story begins from the 15-year imprisonment with labor from the prosecutor of the prosecutors' office at the highest chief prosecutor's office, giving up the appeal, and hearing about the case occurred in the year 1978 from the 1978 violent organization Yavi-spathal spathal roads. The Yavi-spathal paths attached to Yavi-spaths when they were sent to the assault murder accident at the time of 1978, and they died of people in the North Sknawawawawawawawawawawawa, and the designated number of people was cancelled after they were treated as the motor vehicle accident.In addition, the chief prosecutor at the highest chief prosecutor at the office was in the Yagna, and was in the accident site through the North Sknawawawawawa.

2. Triang angle (25 to 30 pages);

The chief prosecutor in charge of the highest number of pages takes the master of the master master, drinks the master, and appeared a new leap, which is a master or a contact with the master.

3. Pharmainavia (31 to 38 pages);

From the prosecutor of the last head of the department, he listens to the talk about the murder case which pretended to cause a traffic accident, and the reporter in the last order is booming to the way of the math of the math of the math.

박성길은 당시 사건을 이야기하면서 이용후 박사의 살인장면을 상스러운 말로 표현하고 있는데 매우 잔인한 방법으로 죽였다고 한다. 특히 "빼쌍 곯아빠진 안경쟁이 샌님인데 요놈이 꼭 며루치같은 놈이, 와 깡다구는 겁나뻐려. 야구빠따로 대갈통을 쌔려뻐려도 죽을 때까정 입도 안 벌리더구마."(34면 상단)이라든가, "그 놈들 시키는 대로 정신없이 패버렸으라. 창수 그 새끼가 가꾸목으로 턱주가리를 날려 뻐리고, 촉새 그 새끼는 야구빠따로 수박통을 쪼샀구면. 깍두기 국물 철철 흘리면서도 그 샌님은 초지일관 일언반구도 없두마. 우리는 시킨대로 야구빠따 한 방으로 끝내버리고 북악 스카이웨이에 버렸제. 그리고는 후진해 갖고 차로 깔아 뻐렸어. 일이랄 것도 없이 시덥잖게 끝내버렸지."(35면 중단)와 같은 부분은 살인장면을 비어를 사용하여 잔인하게 묘사하고 있다.

4. Conco criminal affairs (39 through 49 pages);

The reporter in the face-to-face net crime had a criminal (one-person co-coin) who was known to the general public, confirmed the records of this case and tracking the case (44 pages).

5. The secrets of national cemeteries (the pages 103 through 111); and

The master who is a master master in the sphere of competence is able to confirm that the doctor's degree is inside the national cemetery, along with the co-criminal affairs.

6. Tymology (13 to 115 pages);

A person who is a master master in the sphere of competence shall grasp the personal records of a doctor's degree after use from among the list of overseas scientists of a master's office (14 pages).

7. Sheet (131 to 141 pages);

In order to see the fact that the person who was in the face of the last head of the Gu was called from the prosecutor of the last head of the Gu, and thought about the way of gambling, Northern Scarwa, the after-use and the new leap, etc., he tried to build a lux (132 to 134 pages).

8. Scarwawa (143 to 153 pages);

In this process, the author explains the process of scarwawa as to the truth of the case while responding to the field with the Morocwawawawawawawawawawawawawawa, and then the doctor's degree after the use of the case was tried to go to the triang angle at the time of the case.

9. A reporter or a criminal case (155 to 163 pages);

In this process, attention is given to the relationship between use and triangulation and the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body.

10. The expansion of power (165 to 184 pages);

The flag in the sphere of net crime has been in Korea by looking at the design drawing of the original friology in the bones of the bridge to a frier who enters the science and technology center in the U.S. and has returned to the President of Park Jong-hee. (167 pages)

In addition, it is thought that a doctor's degree after use from the prosecutor of the highest head of the department would have heard a fluoral degree of a person who was the central axis of the nuclear development plan of Park Jong-hee, and that the doctor's degree after use would have become a fluoral relationship with the flusium.

11. Latent (185 to 203 pages).

In addition, the author argues that the doctor's degree of this Act has been gathered for one year by the name of the President Park Jong-hee, and that the doctor's degree of this Act, together with the President Park Jong-hee, the Chief of Security Service, and the head of the Information Department, is expressed that the doctor's degree of this Act, as well as the head of the Information Department, is written.

In addition, it is described differently from the fact that the doctor's degree after use was under management in the Cheongdae-man's Office (199).In addition, the doctor's degree after use is the driving of the nuclear development plan, and the driver's degree was the most likely victim of the traffic accident (210 pages).

12. The wind of the Pacific Ocean (205 to 217 pages);

He talks about doctor's and nuclear development (211 pages) while he talks about the head of Ansan-hee's, and the head of the highest level of prosecutor's office continues to talk about the relationship between a doctor's and a new leap, etc. after the nuclear development and use of the master master.

13. Bluoride (219 through 240 pages)

After the use, a person who kills a doctor's degree after the use of the doctor's, kills his/her first brutal path.

14. COSmapool I (260 to 286 pages);

Mad Mad Madren, who belongs to New York Synst Synst v. He listens to a flusium that the doctor’s degree was killed by international conspiracy led by the United States (280 to 286 pages).

In other words, the United States, in order to prevent the development of the nuclear weapons of Korea, killed a doctor's degree after the use of the sewage by preventing the development of the nuclear weapons of Korea, murdered in the Cheongdae-Jak Sawawawa, the Cheongdae, the Cheongdae, the Cheongdae, to give a dial warning to the President Park Jong-hee, and made some of the passport leave the passport to the body to identify it.

15. COSmapolym2 (2, 13 through 25 pages);

In the respondent's "Brithiology", the part concerning doctor's degree after use in the respondent's "Brithiology emblem" is as it is (13 to 15). He continues to talk about doctor's degree and nuclear development after use.

16. A plan (37 to 53 pages) for Folchis (55 to 65 pages).

In addition, since the use of a tax-type professor in the United States, he listens to finites that doctor's post-use will be killed by the information body of the United States, and then the doctor's post-use will make efforts to return to Korea the loan funds for the promotion of science allocated to Israel.In addition, after the use of a tax-type professor points out the problems of the reverse speed of the finites for the transit landing in the Aolro plan of the United States, it will also be pointed out that the final plan has been postponed by finites in the Aolro plan, focusing on the reverse speed of the finching process for the transit landing.

17. Liberia (67 to 83 pages)

After using a doctor's, a person who has already been married to a doctor's (U.S. person who is a father's father), and a person who has already heard a doctor's opinion about a doctor's degree after using it, and visit the house where a doctor's degree had already been living. The person who has already been living together in the U.S. is deemed to have been living together in the United States.

18. A tent (a 85 to 97 pages);

After using the doctor's room, I find the letter sent by the President Park Jong-hee to the doctor's degree on March 18, 1977 and then the post-use of the doctor's degree on March 20, 1977.(This letter and work are cited in the "Nuclear Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethic Ethic Ethic Ethic Ethic Ethic Ethic Ethic Ethic Ethic Ethic E

In addition, the person who was the subject of the right net crime is in sight of the U.S., and the doctor's degree after the use has already been viewed as the her husband if the real name is already married with the Korean people.

19. Re-seeing bureau (Articles 99 through 104);

After using the doctor's body, the master master's body will re-examine the master's body (101 to 102) and then organize the process during the period.

20. 15 August 1980 (the pages 127 through 140); and

From the number of cases where the senior executive officers held the senior executive officers, he/she heard the talk about the nuclear development plan of doctor's and the President Park Jong-hee after use, and knew that he/she was the scheduled date of the underground nuclear experiment on August 15, 1980.

21. Nuclear nucleus (141 to 149 pages);

A senior net offender is to listen to the talk that Cheongdae D&C has a permanent residence in a foreign country from Annbsonnson, and the visibility that has already been received from the port has already been requested to repair.

22. Confidentiality (151 to 159 pages);

It is found that US$60,000 was deposited in Switzerland bank on July 25, 1978 in the name of doctor after the time of request for repair.

In the face of the face-to-face, the reporter of the face-to-face net crime has already contacted the real world, and he has completed the procedure to find money deposited in the doctor's secret seat after use in Korea and has already visited the funeral room of the doctor's post-use as a national cemetery.

23. Death of coin (171 to 183 pages);

After the use, the ambling of the doctor's homicide case and the death of the ambalk, and the ambal shall be the ambalk of the ambalk immediately before the death of the ambal.

Judges Lee Dong-dae (Presiding Judge)