정산금
1. All appeals filed by the Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff and the claim for return of the provisional payment are dismissed.
2. The return of the appeal cost shall be the provisional payment.
The reasoning for this Court’s explanation is as follows: (a) evidence additionally submitted in the trial, which is insufficient to reverse the facts acknowledged by the first instance court; and (b) the reasoning for the first instance judgment is as stated in the reasoning for rejecting the submission of each order to submit financial transaction information to a company bank and the NAF, except for the rejection of the results of the party members’ respective orders to submit financial transaction information to the company bank and the NAF; and (c) thus, (d)
Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and all of the defendant's appeal and the application for return of provisional payment are dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.