beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 포항지원 2013.05.23 2013고단306

특수절도등

Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, as to the Defendants for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 00:30 on October 2, 2012, the Defendants, R, and H changed the network at the AI officetel parking lot, Defendant AG and R, and H, and Defendant AF opened the AK towing vehicle onto the victim AJ owned by the victim who was parked in the area and moved out of the market price of the victim’s possession. The Defendants, R, and H changed the market price of the victim’s possession.

As a result, Defendants, R, and H stolen the above victim's goods together.

2. Defendants, R, and H are “AM”-owned in the direction of “AM” located in the north-gu Ma at Port on October 2, 2012, around 00:50, the Defendants, R, and H are “AM”-owned and located therein.

Stobama found one unit and conspireds to steals it.

Defendant

AG, R, and H reported the network from various sides, and Defendant AF tried to remove the dracker, which was stolen as referred to in the preceding paragraph, into the dracker next to the dracker of the above dracker, put the dracker into the dracker, put the dracker into the dracker, put the dracker into the dracker, and cut it into a way of

However, in the case of the matha, the matha, R, and H, as the matha, fleded from the matha to the matha.

As a result, Defendants, R, and H jointly tried to steal the victim's urbane, but they did not commit an attempted crime.

3. At around 01:30 on October 2, 2012, the Defendants, R, and H conspiredd with the victim Q Q, a R 125C BAV BAV (BEV) AP car, which is set up by sticking the keys from the frontway at the port of port at the port of port.

Defendant

AF and AH reported the network from the behind part of the above Oralba, and while Defendant AG viewed the network before, R returned the key of the above Oralba, and driven after driving.

As a result, Defendants, R, and H stolen the victim's urbane together.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. An interrogation protocol of R by the prosecution;

1. Police for AJ, N, and Q respectively.