Victim F(n, 31 years old) is a broadcasting artist.

On April 17, 2012, the victim agreed not to photograph the victim's chest exposure, when concluding a "spe contract" with the victim to make an investment or distribution in G (ju representative director H) G, and to make an investment or distribution as the main film of 19 gold (legal) adult film I.

However, around May 2012, the Defendant would not necessarily exclude the face of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp.

“At the time when the female was exposed to her chest with the consent of the injured party,” the photograph was completed.

Thus, the Defendant displayed the compact videos on October 2012, 201, which were taken by the victim of the above E office, to be exposed to her chest, but after that, the victim demanded the victim not to disclose the her chest exposure surface. In response, on October 25, 2012, the Defendant came to open the theater with the removal of the her chest exposure surface.

1. If the defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (Kameras, etc.) and so, even if the defendant did not go against the victim's will at the time of photographing the chest at the time of photographing the chest, the defendant agreed to the effect that "if the victim excluded him from the face in the editing process, it would be excluded from the face" at the time of photographing. The victim later requested that the victim not disclose the part of the chest exposure to the defendant, and so long as the defendant consented to the disclosure, the victim later goes against the defendant's will.