건축법위반
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (a fine of three million won) declared by the lower court is too unhued and unreasonable.
2. The defendant has the same criminal records as that of the judgment.
However, in full view of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant recognized the Defendant’s mistake from the investigative agency to the court; (b) the Defendant was imposed a penalty surcharge and a non-performance penalty by an administrative agency; and (c) the Defendant appears to have lawfully obtained permission from the administrative agency after the instant crime; and (d) the Defendant’s age, character, family relation, environment, occupation; (b) details and details leading to the instant crime; and (c) circumstances leading up to the sentencing conditions indicated in the record, such as the circumstances after the commission of the crime, etc., the Defendant’s sentence of the lower court cannot be deemed unfair because the sentence
3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.