A. On September 15, 1922, the Plaintiff purchased the Pyeongtaek BJ (BK) size 704 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”) as a common line with BHC BI’s son, and had a title trust with the networkJ, net Z, net P, Defendant H, and network AG at the time, which was a member of the clan, but thereafter has preserved the said real estate after holding an additional title trust with 1/13 shares of each of 13 members to the 13 members in total, under a title trust with the net AM, Defendant F, Defendant G, Defendant G, Defendant C, Defendant D, Defendant D, Defendant E, and net BC.

B. Meanwhile, among the above title trustee, the network J, Z, P, AG, AM, and BC died, and the Defendants’ details holding or succeeding the status of each title trustee and the shares held therein are as shown in the attached Form.

C. Meanwhile, around May 1, 2017, the Plaintiff filed the instant lawsuit seeking the cancellation of title trust with the Defendants on the instant real estate as the final service of the duplicate of the instant complaint, and sought the return thereof. The date of the final service of the duplicate of the instant complaint is November 30, 2017.

2. According to the above fact-finding, the Defendants, who were the title trustee with respect to the instant land or succeeded to the status of the title trustee, are obligated to implement the registration procedure for transfer of ownership based on the termination of title trust as of November 30, 2017, among the instant land, to the Plaintiff, the title truster.

3. If so, the plaintiff's claim of this case against the defendants is justified, and all of them are accepted. It is so decided as per Disposition.