However, only the defendant appealed on the guilty portion of the court below on the grounds of mistake of facts and unreasonable sentencing, and since the dismissal of prosecution is separated and finalized by the defendant and the prosecutor's failure to appeal, the scope of this court's judgment is limited to the convicted portion

2. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. As to the obstruction of performance of official duties by asserting mistake of facts, the Defendant did not have committed an intentional obstruction of performance of official duties by exercising force against a police officer when the police officer tried to arrest the Defendant, which was merely a fluence of the body of the police officer in the process of leaving the body to defend him.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below convicting this part of the facts charged is erroneous in misconception of facts that affected the judgment.

B. The 1-year imprisonment (Confiscation and additional collection of KRW 100,000) imposed by the court below on the defendant is too unreasonable.

3. Determination

가. 사실오인 주장에 대한 판단 원심이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거들에 의하여 알 수 있는 다음과 같은 사정들 즉, ① 당시 신고를 받고 출동한 경찰관 F는 수사단계에서부터 원심법정에 이르기까지 "신고를 받고 출동하였더니 피고인이 그의 어머니의 멱살을 잡고 폭행하려 해서 이를 제지하자 피고인이 욕설을 하며 같이 출동한 E 경위를 밀치고 제가 허리띠에 차고 있던 권총을 빼앗으려고 하였다. 이를 제지하자 피고인이 저의 손목을 꺽으면서 달려들었고 피고인을 공무집행방해의 현행범인으로 체포하였다“고 구체적이고 일관되게 진술하고 있는 점 특히 F는 원심법정에서 "피고인이 총을...