beta
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.11.08 2018누62715

영업정지처분 등 취소

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

The court's explanation of this case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance other than the following, thus admitting this case as it is in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(1) The grounds for appeal by the Plaintiff do not differ significantly from the allegations in the first instance court, and even if all the evidence submitted by the first instance court and this court are examined, the first instance court’s decision rejecting the Plaintiff’s assertion is justifiable). The “salvance” of the first instance court’s 6, 7 and 6, 20 are all “safety”.

No. 6 of the judgment of the first instance court, the "existing Improvement" of the first instance judgment shall be applied to the "existing Stock".

No. 10 of the first instance judgment, No. 14 of the first instance judgment, "No. 1" is added to "No. 1".

In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.