At around 01:50 on 25, 201, the Defendant 10 minutes of disturbance, such as: (a) the victim C’s “D restaurant” operated by the victim C in the Guri-si B without any particular reason, and (b) the mobile phone equipment and the water reservoir at the bottom.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of water reservoir damaged parts;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the choice of punishment for a crime (to be chosen by imprisonment in consideration of the fact that there are many criminal records of the same kind