However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who engages in food service.

On December 18, 2014, the Defendant: (a) 01:10, around 01:10, 10, 102-dong 2, 516, 102-dong 2, 102-dong 2, 102-dong 2, where the Defendant was living together with his spouse, and reported that domestic violence occurred by the Defendant’s spouse; (b) she was sent to the site after receiving a report from the Defendant’s spouse; (c) she was able to take care of the police officer’s domestic violence; and (d) her head of the Donsan Police Station, who was sent to the site; and (d) her head of a slope E’s chest, pushed the head of the sloping E, walking the head of the sloping E, walking the snow part of the slope, obstructing the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the crime prevention and investigation, etc.; (d) at the same time, the victim, her snow, snow, and open room.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of E;

1. Investigation report (on-site mobilization status, etc.);

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photograph on the spot, take photographs on the part of an injury, and pent pictures;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (The conditions favorable to the following reasons for sentencing)

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62-2(1) of the Social Service Order Criminal Act and Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc. is deemed to have been committed by assaulting a police officer dispatched by a defendant upon receiving a report of a domestic violence incident to interfere with his/her performance of duties, and at the same time, causing injury requiring medical treatment for about two weeks, which is not good and criminal, and the defendant repeatedly committed the crime of this case including the same crime even though he/she had the record of being punished one time as a fine due to the crime of injury.

However, the defendant is the case.