except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On April 25, 2014, at around 23:00, the Defendant used “C” music stores located in the Masan-si B and the fourth floor of Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Seoul, as an issue of the drinking value D and the drinking value. The Defendant, without any particular reason, abused F of the circumstances where the police box affiliated with the Mapo-dong Police Station E box called up to the above D to the said D to ask the said D to “the drinking value is high.” Without any specific reason, the Defendant assaulted F of the said F on one occasion, such as “if he is called out due to the drinking value,” and “if he is called out due to the drinking value,” and assaulted F on one occasion the chest of the said F.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police protocol to D and F

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor concerning the crime;

1. The reason for the sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (hereinafter the reason for sentencing) of the suspended sentence [the scope of recommendation] The reason for the sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act / [the scope of punishment for the obstruction of performance of official duties] There is no basic area (6 to 1 year and 4 months) of the obstruction of official duties (the special person) / [the decision of sentence] (the decision of sentence / in order to establish a national legal order and eradicate the light of the public authority, it is necessary to strictly punish the crime of the obstruction of official duties. However, the defendant is against his wrong recognition, and there is no record of the same kind of crime, etc.