except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 05:30 on July 6, 2014, the Defendant, at the third floor of the Da building in Busan Metropolitan City, called “D,” G (Nam, 29 years old), who was a policeman belonging to the F District in the Busan Metropolitan Police Station (F District), and H (Nam, 43 years old), who was a guard belonging to the said District, was in the course of the instant case from the Defendant, proposed that the police officers are tightly protruding the Defendant’s breast part of the Defendant’s chest while hearing the circumstances of the instant case, the Defendant was tightly pushed the Defendant, and the police officers were tightly pushed the Defendant’s chest part of G two times in two tights, and tried to kill the chest part of G’s chest, and h’s knife the Defendant’s son, and h’s knife the Defendant’s son, and h’s bridged the Defendant’s h’s son.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the investigation of G and H, a police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement of H, G, and E;

1. A report on investigation;

1. Application of statutes on photographs of damage;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The sentencing criteria [Scope of Recommendation] The basic area (six months to one year and four months) of the obstruction of performance of official duties shall be the category 1 (the obstruction of performance of official duties and the coercion of official duties).

2. The sentence of sentence is determined by comprehensively taking account of the fact that the defendant who made the decision of sentence confessions and does not are relatively much severe to obstruct the execution of official duties, but the defendant is subject to criminal punishment for the same kind of crime