대여금
1. The Defendant is jointly and severally with the Plaintiff Company B, as to KRW 163,580,943 and KRW 92,925,00 among them, on May 10, 2016.
In full view of the respective descriptions of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5 (including additional numbers) and the overall purport of the pleadings, the defendant is liable to pay the plaintiff the unpaid principal and interest and delay damages as shown in the attached Form.
The Defendant asserts to the effect that “the five-year extinctive prescription for the instant claim has expired”.
However, there is no argument as to the starting point of the statute of limitations, and in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings as to the statement No. 1, it can be known that the lawsuit was filed in this case since five years have not passed since the expiration date of the credit period or the date of loss of the benefit of the time limit, which can be seen as the starting point of the statute of limitations as to
If so, the plaintiff's claim is reasonable and acceptable.