포상금지급 거부처분 취소 청구의 소
The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On March 2017, the Plaintiff filed a report with the Defendant on unlawful acts to the effect that the Plaintiff committed an illegal act, such as setting up three liftss at a parking facility in the BP school (hereinafter “instant maintenance school”) designated pursuant to Article 28 of the Act on the Development of Workplace Skills of Workers (hereinafter “Act”).
B. In the instant improvement school, the Defendant: (a) confirmed the fact that the instant improvement school equipped with practical training equipment at the facility for the purpose of the parking lot and obtained designation as a vocational training establishment; (b) notified the Plaintiff of this fact on May 26, 2017; and (c) on February 28, 2018, notified the instant improvement school operator of the instant improvement school of the fact that “the designation of a designated vocational training establishment was obtained by illegal means” on the ground that the instant improvement school operator was “designated by the designated vocational training establishment by illegal means; and (d) notified the Plaintiff of this fact on March 15, 2018.
On the other hand, the operator of the instant improvement school filed an administrative litigation seeking revocation of the revocation of the designation of the instant improvement school.
- The revocation of the designation of the instant rearrangement school is an administrative disposition based on Article 31 of the Act, and a monetary reward for reporting under Article 57 of the Act is known to the effect that it is paid for the relevant violations of Articles 16, 19, and 24 of the Act.
The reward for reporting that you have applied for is a case to be determined according to the results of the department in charge of illegal receipt of the reward for reporting.
C. On March 23, 2018, the Plaintiff requested the Defendant to pay a monetary reward for illegal receipt under Article 57(1) of the Act. On April 11, 2018, the Defendant responded to the Plaintiff as follows.
The plaintiff.