If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be paid.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving CCA110.

On July 7, 2012, at around 00:33, the Defendant driven the above 00:33, and driven the same road in front of the 601-35-dong, Ansan-si, Annsan-si, Annsan-si, along the two-lanes, along the two-lanes from Annsan-si, Annsan-si.

Since a signal light and crosswalk are installed, it was confirmed whether a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to safely drive according to the new code and confirm whether there is a person who will cut the road by reducing speed and by properly examining the right and the right of the road.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and caused the victim D (the age of 46, remaining) who had not dried the crosswalk to the front part of the defendant's vehicle, until the pedestrian signal starts with the crosswalk when the pedestrian signal was turned to the left side of the direction of the defendant's course, and the pedestrian signal was turned to the red, when the pedestrian signal was turned to the red.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim D, such as “the 4th head of the 4th head of the side,” which requires the victim D’s treatment for about four weeks due to such occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. A survey report on actual conditions, a traffic accident occurrence report, field photograph, diagnosis certificate, signal cycle tag, and each investigation report;

1. Application of statutes to inquiries about criminal records, etc.;

1. Article 3 (1), the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.