However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is the Defendant’s ability to support the president of the said association as a director of the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government DD reconstruction Association, and E was the ability to oppose the director of the said association to the president of the said association. The Defendant was the position of accepting the said apartment building on May 30, 2016, and the opposing forces were the opposite forces.

On June 3, 2016, the Defendant attended an appraisal briefing session held by a opposing force around 19:00 and signed a signature on the document of title "Written Objection to Appraisal and Written Request for Specification - Signature."

However, when the above documents were submitted to an appraisal corporation with the document attached to the “request for objection and explanation of the amount of appraisal,” the Defendant, who was aware of the fact that he was signed in the document to the effect that he had the support force’s logic and opposition, was forged, was willing to gather up the situation by filing a complaint with the opposing party to the effect that the signature of the Defendant was forged.

On June 8, 2016, according to the distribution of Seocho-gu Seoul, the Defendant submitted a written complaint to the Seoul Central District Public Prosecutor's Office's Office that "E, etc., using the attendance book signed at the briefing session for appraisal and exercised the above signature book as if he/she had signed the signature book for the objection of appraisal and the request book for explanation," and stated to the police officer F of the Seoul Seocho District Public Prosecutor's Office that investigated the instant case under the direction of the prosecutor on the 16th day of the same month.

However, on June 3, 2016, the Defendant attended an appraisal briefing session and signed the name of the document stating "the objection to appraisal and the request for explanation - the signature".

Accordingly, the Defendant submitted a false complaint, and made a supplementary statement to the same effect, and made a false accusation for the purpose of having E, etc. receive criminal punishment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. E. of the witness;